FX pairs, equities, commodity futures and crypto markets can share timestamps and bid/ask fields, but they do not share every calendar, unit or identifier convention. Keep asset-specific metadata attached rather than forcing it into a misleading universal symbol.
Integration scope
Start with an agreed instrument catalogue and consumer matrix. Validate precision, sessions and source permissions for each class, then test how downstream applications handle instruments that are closed, unavailable or missing an optional field.
Requirements to confirm
Asset-specific instrument metadata
Consumer coverage matrix
Precision and calendar rules
Optional field and status handling
Bring the proposed instrument list, source documentation and consumer workflow to a technical discussion. The agreed integration specification defines coverage, fields, usage permissions and acceptance tests.
Integration brief
Multi-Asset Price Feed: what to agree before connecting
Instrument scope
Identify the exact underlying, source identifier, quote currency and intended use.
Consumer workflow
List trading platforms, charts, risk tools and applications that need the output.
Delivery contract
Agree protocol, quote fields, timestamps, source status and recovery behaviour.
Production review
Confirm source rights, integration ownership, test evidence and commercial scope.
Begin with a consumer and instrument inventory
For your instrument universe, define who consumes the prices and what each system needs to reconstruct a usable quote. An application dashboard, broker platform and historical process can require different delivery rules even when they share one normalized instrument model.
What to test
Compare instrument definitions before combining or substituting sources.
Exercise disconnects and confirm the status presented to each consumer.
Review results with the source, adapter and consuming application owners.